Participants (Doodle):
Apologies (unable to attend):
Meeting minutes from earlier meetings
(Reminder of the new committee structure and List of committee members)
General: Welcome Committee has not yet done a welcome party for the last round (Round 4) of Ambassadors. Other Committees would like to see how Ambassadors are being reviewed- Process document to be shared (ZR)
Suggestions – how to make the Review process more transparent?
List of inducted Ambassadors/Initiatives
How are things going?
Suggestion – reviewing at set time periods, eg. 4 times a year. Reduces ongoing work for Review Committee
Process point – increasing efficiency and considering Reviewing strategy (ie, aiming to get through lots of applications at once? Or, staggering them so as to give incoming Ambassadors time to get settled in the community?) – discussion to be continued with Review Committee and Local Groups team
How can we get started?
No members present, tabled.
Welcome calls – how are they going?
Suggestion – representation on this committee from varying time zones, so at least one person is available
To do: Welcome Party guidelines, including: How long after induction calls should take place
Mentoring Committee to discuss further via discussion list: Mentorship Program for incoming Ambassadors and Initiatives
First task coming up: Advising on challenges in expanding the Local Groups Network
#action Review Committee – 3 members now, need 1-2 more. Would anyone like to join?
Prakash to join Review Committee!
#topic Local Group contact registry
#action How can we ensure that the growing network is capable of contacting each other better?
Issue – people using different platforms, where is best to connect everyone? Facebook, Google groups/Google +, Skype, Email. Comments here invited!
#action Thoughts on “Prospects Community” = holding platform/incubator scheme for unsuccessful Ambassador applicants (see background thoughts, proposal and drafted track keeping sheet)
(#action) How are individual groups tracking their engagement (informally or formally)?
(#action) How can we best show the breadth and depth of local group work to the wider community?
(#action) Encouraging knowledge/experience sharing between Local Groups, and more practically, sharing of materials produced.
Demonstrating engagement and impact will help us provide more resources to local groups in the future.
Small grants are available for Local Groups to support events, travel etc.
http://meetinglogs.okfn.org/okfn-int/2013/okfn-int.2013-07-04-14.38.txt
http://meetinglogs.okfn.org/okfn-int/2013/okfn-int.2013-07-04-14.38.log.txt
]]>
You can join the meet up directly here if you don’t have a IRC client: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=okfn-int #okfn-int # freenode
Participants:
* Rufus Pollock, Laura James, Christian Villum, Zara Rahman (Central)
* Oleg Lavrovsky (CH)
* Tomoaki Watanabe (Japan)
* Alberto Albella (ES)
* Everton Zanella Alvarenga (Brazil)
* Michaela Rybickova (Czech Republic)
* Daniel Dietrich (Germany)
* Charalampos Bratsa (Greece)
* Joris Pekel (Netherlands)
* Pierre Chrzanowski (France)
* Haklae Kim (Korea)
* Julia Kloiber (DE)
Listed but not present in IRC
* Samuel Goëta (France)
* Antti Poikola (Finland)
* Thomas Turner (Austria)
Apologies (unable to attend):
* David F. Flanders (Australia)
Channel:
[1] IRC – freenode – #okfn-int (use http://webchat.freenode.net/ if you don’t have an IRC client)
[2] Skype as backup, please add christianvillum, rufuspollock, laura.james, zara.rahman to your Skype contacts.
Logging
Laura will be logging the meeting, full transcript here.
Agenda
Introducing Zara Rahman, new OKF International Community Manager
Zara was welcomed. She is based in Berlin.
Restructuring the International Council
Feedback on the v2 proposal for distributed governance was requested.
Rufus raised the question of communications eg sharing learning; the Summit was a great opportunity for this but how can we keep it going?
Trusting new people: how can we trust people we haven’t all worked with? Perhaps new ambassadors could serve an “apprenticeship” and show results… whilst being mentored.
What’s the number of ambassador applications? 1-2 per week, over 30 in pipeline. Already 5 Ambassadors plus Initiatives & Chapters.
Do we actively look after people who apply to be Ambassadors but are put in the “holding pattern”? Do we have resource for this? would this be part of the Review Committee responsibility?
The committees:
Steering committee:
The committee was introduced as per the v2 document and no objections raised.
Mentoring committee:
Was introduced. Christian and Zara will be on this committee too.
Nominees: Everton; Pierre;Julia
Potential: Charalampos to check with Lazaros
Review Committee:
Was introduced.
Nominees: Charalampos, Oleg
There was a proposal to merge the Projects and Outreach committees as they are similar in focus. This proposal was agreed.
Nominees for Projects & Outreach Committee:
* Alberto Abella (ES)
* Daniel Dietrich (DE)
* Haklae Kim (Korea)
* Joris Pekel (NL)